| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 |
1. Sleeper Level AI in mission rats is the day drones are screwed - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Lord WarATron on 08/08/2009 09:04:45 Well, I use t1 disposable drones anyway for PvE, unless there is a chance of pvp where its t2 all the way. But yeah I guess the point is a intresting one. More importantly, such a change could ...
- by Lord WarATron - at 2009.08.08 09:03:00
|
2. ECM Ships - Looking at better defined roles - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Leave ECM as it is, but remove that 20 second Jam cycle. All problems with ECm trace back to the long cycle rather than the actual act of lock breaking. -- Billion Isk Mission
- by Lord WarATron - at 2009.03.25 06:45:00
|
3. LOL - Really? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Lord WarATron on 23/03/2009 21:32:05 Its should be a simple fix. The reason you miss at 0 is due to a divide by zero on the tracking formula, which makes 0m range impossible to hit. Its a bug and a very basic bug at that. This does...
- by Lord WarATron - at 2009.03.23 21:31:00
|
4. Singularity Installer and Patches - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Lord WarATron on 08/03/2009 16:43:23 Edited by: Lord WarATron on 08/03/2009 16:36:08 Since the link is broken on the patch page, here is the direct link for folks stuck with 83552 83552 to 83913 Its a small patch Then htt...
- by Lord WarATron - at 2009.03.08 16:36:00
|
5. Putting EVEs cache on a ram drive, Now and in Aposomething - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Lord WarATron on 17/02/2009 17:33:38 o/ rex. Its almost pointless now. I tested it via a ramdrive and a non-ramdrive alt on a 2nd even less powerful computer. Its pretty much the same time for both. The issues were more to do with...
- by Lord WarATron - at 2009.02.17 17:32:00
|
6. Why make Eve more acessible for unintelligente peoples? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Lord WarATron on 14/02/2009 13:28:58 Originally by: Loka xDD This last patch is scaring me... Why every patch CCP is making Eve more dumbier? I mean, easier tutorials, align button, now way too easy scanning with probes sys...
- by Lord WarATron - at 2009.02.14 13:29:00
|
7. what is with the new patching system on the test server!!!!?!??!??! - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Lord WarATron on 14/02/2009 01:15:24 Relax folks. This is the test client and the expectations are different. They have the auto-patcher pointing to the wrong file, so just hold up till they fix it. Its not the final product, its n...
- by Lord WarATron - at 2009.02.14 01:13:00
|
8. what is with the new patching system on the test server!!!!?!??!??! - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Lord WarATron on 13/02/2009 22:28:17 that small 704kbs download you claim is listing as............ "There is a new build available. Would you like to download it now? The build is 732.4 MB in size." I guess its MB not kbs
- by Lord WarATron - at 2009.02.13 22:28:00
|
9. The Unforeseen Consequences of Apocrypha - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Well, its something that needs to be looked at. E.G I pvp in a t3 ship and shoot a player who ejects his t3 ship to save his SP. After parking my t3 ship at a safe, I eject out of my t3 ship and head over to pickup the t3 ship that was left unpil...
- by Lord WarATron - at 2009.02.11 00:16:00
|
10. Lose your modular ship, you lose SP... - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: ResearchBunny Beatrix Originally by: MotherMoon where the hell is the dev blog with it coming out for testing in under 20 hours? Quiet, they're still trying to make sure it doesn't nuke boot.ini again. I guess...
- by Lord WarATron - at 2009.02.09 08:07:00
|
11. Don't forget to fix the Black Ops - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Rajere Originally by: Lord WarATron Originally by: Amy Wang Give it the fuel bay and the ability to ignore cyno jammers in the next big patch, just as you promised. It is long overdue really. Both of whi...
- by Lord WarATron - at 2009.02.09 00:14:00
|
12. Don't forget to fix the Black Ops - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Amy Wang Give it the fuel bay and the ability to ignore cyno jammers in the next big patch, just as you promised. It is long overdue really. Both of which are the same as putting a Band-Aid on a broken leg. These ships ...
- by Lord WarATron - at 2009.02.08 23:19:00
|
13. Lose your modular ship, you lose SP... - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Lord WarATron on 08/02/2009 12:50:58 Originally by: Pistonbroke Originally by: Lord WarATron I do not really think it would effect the super rich much. They would just use a alt to level up the ships, or pay lots o...
- by Lord WarATron - at 2009.02.08 12:51:00
|
14. Lose your modular ship, you lose SP... - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Lord WarATron on 08/02/2009 11:51:16 Originally by: Pistonbroke The loss of T3 related SP seems to me to be a perfect foil against those individuals and organisations which have access to (almost) unlimited ISK, whether thru...
- by Lord WarATron - at 2009.02.08 11:50:00
|
15. Lose your modular ship, you lose SP... - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Too much speculation at the moment. Wait for the blog or sisi update. For all we know, Ship SP might take like a hour, in which case its a non issue. What some people think, is that ship SP means you cannot train up your normal SP skills. This ma...
- by Lord WarATron - at 2009.02.08 11:01:00
|
16. Lose your modular ship, you lose SP... - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Lets wait and see what Sisi has to show about it. If its a seperate type of ship baised SP, one that does not effect a character's SP, then its ok. Well, to be honest, I am not impressed with any form of "use a alt to level up a ship afk". And th...
- by Lord WarATron - at 2009.02.08 00:20:00
|
17. The rumor mill nerf on Nano's - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Rocket Ajax Originally by: Lord WarATron Edited by: Lord WarATron on 11/07/2008 12:21:53 Nano's are fine. The counter to nano could use a bit of a boost, since your scram range on a nano is only as good as your w...
- by Lord WarATron - at 2008.07.13 08:53:00
|
18. The rumor mill nerf on Nano's - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Lord WarATron on 11/07/2008 12:21:53 Nano's are fine. The counter to nano could use a bit of a boost, since your scram range on a nano is only as good as your web range. Tbh, long range low power webs scripts might be the solution t...
- by Lord WarATron - at 2008.07.11 12:22:00
|
19. Black Ops good on paper, a joke in reality? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Ramius Decimus Edited by: Ramius Decimus on 06/07/2008 07:42:36 My god, does no one read the ship's description? Black Ops aren't designed for combat. Why would they be if there are already viable combat battleships avai...
- by Lord WarATron - at 2008.07.07 06:59:00
|
20. NPC ECM, FW and game balance - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Matalino, that guy is trolling you. -- Billion Isk Mission
- by Lord WarATron - at 2008.06.24 16:57:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |